Trivia Leaderboard

See all the traditional Singles averages here.

Trivia HQ ... all the minor and mostly meaningless player stats gathered together in one place!

• Best performers in Singles points for/against overall
• Best performers in 5-game Singles legs
• Best performers in games ("Ends") won
• Best performers in Doubles legs
• Most points in a Singles leg
• Most 5-game legs in a match
• Most points in a match
• Giantkillers
• Heroic recoveries: They went 2-0 down, but won 3-2
• Distribution of match scores
• Improvers: who has got better scores this season than last season, against the same players?

• Best performers in Singles points for/against overall (qualification: 250 points):
  

  Pos	Player	Club	Points For	Won (Percent)
  1	Martin Ceresa	Hursley	1151	65.6%
  2	Graham Lynch	Five Tees	1273	63.1%
  3	Keith Charbit-Middleton	Five Tees	1600	61.7%
  4	Barry Dobson	Hursley	2045	60.1%
  5	Paul May	IBM	797	57.9%
  6	Sorin Lakatos	Five Tees	2068	57.6%
  7	Ian Burgess	Swanmore	1184	57.5%
  8	Rob Chapman	South Wonston	970	57.4%
  9	Tom Wood	IBM	1644	56.6%
  10	Jared Schaller	IBM	1157	56.0%
  11	Sanjay Nagchowdhury	IBM	1373	55.7%

  
  
• Best performers in 5-game Singles legs (qualification: three 5-game Singles):
  

  Pos	Player	Club	Played	Won (Percent)
  1	Hannah Wills	Five Tees	6	100.0%
  1	Barry Dobson	Hursley	6	100.0%
  1	Sanjay Nagchowdhury	IBM	5	100.0%
  1	Bobby Zhou	Kings	4	100.0%
  5	Adam Lee	South Wonston	10	90.0%
  6	Clive Welsman	Kings	8	87.5%
  7	Russell Durham	Winnall	15	86.7%
  8	Keith Dickenson	IBM	5	80.0%
  9	Geoff Ball	IBM	8	75.0%
  9	Gary Longland	Five Tees	4	75.0%
  9	Jared Schaller	IBM	4	75.0%
  9	Ed Slot	Kings	4	75.0%
  9	Paul May	IBM	4	75.0%

  
  
• Best performers in games ("Ends") won (qualification: nine Ends):
  

  Pos	Player	Club	Played	Won (Percent)
  1	Martin Ceresa	Hursley	106	91.5%
  2	Sean Pickin	Medstead	10	90.0%
  2	John McBeath	Kings	10	90.0%
  4	Graham Lynch	Five Tees	118	89.8%
  5	Keith Charbit-Middleton	Five Tees	151	87.4%
  6	Barry Dobson	Hursley	192	83.3%
  7	Rob Chapman	South Wonston	94	76.6%
  8	Jared Schaller	IBM	112	75.9%
  9	Danny Klinger	South Wonston	83	74.7%
  10	Sorin Lakatos	Five Tees	200	74.5%
  11	Paul May	IBM	77	74.0%

  
  
• Best performers in Doubles legs (qualification: four Doubles):
  

  Pos	Player	Club	Played	Won (Percent)
  1	Ben Tombs	Medstead	8	100.0%
  1	Andy Knight	Hursley	5	100.0%
  3	Jared Schaller	IBM	9	88.9%
  4	Danny Klinger	South Wonston	7	85.7%
  4	Martin Ceresa	Hursley	7	85.7%
  6	Paul May	IBM	6	83.3%
  7	Keith Charbit-Middleton	Five Tees	11	81.8%
  8	Sorin Lakatos	Five Tees	15	80.0%
  8	Len Field	Five Tees	15	80.0%
  8	Graham Lynch	Five Tees	10	80.0%
  8	Tony Amies	Medstead	5	80.0%
  8	Julian Walton	IBM	5	80.0%

  
  
• Most points in a Singles leg:
  

  116 points	Richard Darch Vs Micky Lang	21-11-18	Five Tees B 2-8 Medstead A	12-14, 11-9, 17-15, 7-11, 9-11
  115 points	Antony Moore Vs John Hayman	08-01-19	Swanmore A 10-0 Medstead B	12-14, 10-12, 15-13, 11-6, 12-10
  114 points	Hannah Wills Vs Rob Christie	05-02-19	Five Tees D 6-4 Swanmore B	13-11, 9-11, 17-19, 16-18
  111 points	Clive Welsman Vs Keith Dickenson	11-03-19	Kings B 1-9 IBM A	11-7, 11-5, 8-11, 12-14, 15-17
  111 points	Jay Jadeja Vs Sorin Lakatos	16-10-18	Kings C 2-8 Five Tees C	12-10, 15-13, 5-11, 12-14, 8-11
  111 points	Peter Budd Vs Barry Mitchell	26-11-18	Owslebury 5-5 Kings E	12-10, 6-11, 10-12, 18-16, 5-11
  111 points	Ian McLeonards Vs Martin Goldstein	28-01-19	Owslebury 2-8 Hursley	11-6, 9-11, 14-16, 13-11, 9-11
  110 points	Tony Cottrell Vs Barry Mitchell	03-10-18	Kings D 7-3 Kings E	15-13, 13-15, 6-11, 11-8, 7-11
  110 points	Adrian Reeves Vs Anne Longland	12-11-18	Kings B 4-6 Five Tees B	3-11, 11-7, 11-13, 15-13, 14-12
  108 points	Paul May Vs Ben Tombs	03-12-18	IBM A 7-3 Medstead A	11-13, 11-8, 10-12, 13-11, 11-8
  107 points	Glenn Phur Vs Kevin Muldowney	14-03-19	Medstead B 4-6 Swanmore A	9-11, 11-6, 12-10, 9-11, 15-13
  107 points	John Bonney Vs Dom Goddard	15-11-18	Medstead B 6-4 South Wonston B	5-11, 11-7, 6-11, 11-5, 19-21
  107 points	Geoff Ball Vs Dave Hooker	15-10-18	IBM B 6-4 Winnall	11-6, 9-11, 12-14, 13-11, 11-9

  
  
• Most 5-game legs in a match:
  

  	Date	Match-card and teams
  6 legs	25-02-19	Kings B 8-2 Five Tees A
  6 legs	21-10-18	Winnall 2-8 Medstead B
  6 legs	08-01-19	Five Tees C 8-2 Kings C
  5 legs	13-03-19	Five Tees B 4-6 Medstead A
  5 legs	11-12-18	Kings C 4-6 Swanmore A
  5 legs	10-01-19	Winnall 5-5 IBM B
  5 legs	09-04-19	Swanmore A 2-8 IBM B
  5 legs	08-11-18	Kings A 3-7 Five Tees A
  5 legs	03-10-18	South Wonston A 3-7 Swanmore A
  4 legs	27-09-18	Medstead B 4-6 Kings C
  4 legs	26-11-18	IBM B 3-7 Five Tees C
  4 legs	26-02-19	Kings C 4-6 Winnall
  4 legs	24-10-18	South Wonston A 5-5 South Wonston B
  4 legs	20-03-19	Kings D 3-7 Five Tees D
  4 legs	19-11-18	Owslebury 6-4 IBM C
  4 legs	19-11-18	Kings C 5-5 IBM B
  4 legs	18-10-18	Medstead B 5-5 Swanmore A
  4 legs	18-03-19	Owslebury 5-5 Swanmore B
  4 legs	17-10-18	Kings D 4-6 Owslebury
  4 legs	17-01-19	Medstead B 6-4 Five Tees C
  4 legs	14-01-19	IBM B 2-8 South Wonston A
  4 legs	14-01-19	Five Tees D 8-2 Kings D
  4 legs	12-11-18	Kings C 3-7 South Wonston A
  4 legs	12-11-18	IBM B 6-4 Swanmore A
  4 legs	12-11-18	Hursley 5-5 Owslebury
  4 legs	11-02-19	Kings B 2-8 Five Tees A
  4 legs	10-12-18	Five Tees D 9-1 Owslebury
  4 legs	09-10-18	Kings A 7-3 Kings B
  4 legs	07-01-19	Kings E 4-6 Hursley
  4 legs	05-02-19	Swanmore A 1-9 Five Tees C
  4 legs	04-04-19	Winnall 9-1 Medstead B
  4 legs	03-10-18	Kings D 7-3 Kings E
  4 legs	01-04-19	South Wonston B 5-5 Winnall

  
  
• Late nights (most points in a match):
  The average number of points per match this season has been 681.

  Total Points	Match	Lateness (amt above average)	Date
  833	Winnall 5-5 IBM B	22.3%	10/01/19
  832	Kings C 4-6 Winnall	22.1%	26/02/19
  829	Swanmore A 2-8 IBM B	21.7%	09/04/19
  828	Kings E 4-6 Hursley	21.5%	07/01/19
  826	Five Tees C 8-2 Kings C	21.2%	08/01/19
  817	Kings B 8-2 Five Tees A	19.9%	25/02/19
  816	Kings C 4-6 Swanmore A	19.8%	11/12/18
  816	Kings C 3-7 South Wonston A	19.8%	12/11/18
  812	Kings A 3-7 Five Tees A	19.2%	08/11/18
  810	Winnall 2-8 Medstead B	18.9%	21/10/18
  798	Medstead B 4-6 Kings C	17.1%	27/09/18

  
  
• Giantkillers
  Who are the pussycats who occasionally roar 'Miaou!!' after a lifetime of meekly saying 'Mew!'? You're featured here!
  The averages shown are per Division, and regardless of which team(s) you played for in that Division.
  Qualification: 7 Singles in the Division concerned, and at least a 35% difference.
  

  	Div	Percent Diff	Underdog		Favourite	Scores
  7 Nov	2	52.1%	Steve Brown (33.3%)	beat	Adam Lee (85.4%)	11-9, 5-11, 11-9, 11-9
  26 Mar	3	49.7%	Kevin Sage (13.3%)	beat	Jill Wilson (63.0%)	11-6, 10-12, 6-11, 11-8, 11-9
  12 Nov	2	46.7%	Geoff Pavey (30.4%)	beat	Hitender Razora (77.1%)	11-5, 10-12, 11-8, 11-7
  13 Dec	2	42.9%	Mike Wooding (25.0%)	beat	Russell Durham (67.9%)	11-7, 11-9, 2-11, 4-11, 11-7
  5 Mar	2	42.3%	Phil Lee (29.6%)	beat	Len Field (71.9%)	10-12, 11-8, 11-9, 11-9
  14 Mar	2	38.1%	Glenn Phur (32.1%)	beat	Kevin Muldowney (70.2%)	9-11, 11-6, 12-10, 9-11, 15-13
  1 Oct	2	37.3%	Glenn Phur (32.1%)	beat	Geoff Ball (69.4%)	15-13, 14-12, 11-8
  19 Nov	2	36.8%	Allan Bransgrove (27.8%)	beat	Iliya Dimitrov (64.6%)	5-11, 5-11, 11-9, 11-9, 11-7

  
  
• They did not cave in after going 2-0 down...
  Is it worth battling on after going 2-0 down in games, even though your average is worse than your opponent's? These players thought so!
  The results are listed in 'Giantkiller' order, comparing the League averages of both players.
  A minus-sign in the 'Percent Diff' column means the player came back to win, even though he or she has a lower average in the same Division.
  To keep the list short, only those who have beaten players with a better average are shown.

  Winner	Loser	Match	Leg score	Percent Diff
  Allan Bransgrove	Iliya Dimitrov	Kings C 5-5 IBM B	5-11, 5-11, 11-9, 11-9, 11-7	-36.8
  Cameron Brealey	Hugo Gregan	Five Tees B 6-4 Kings A	12-10, 13-11, 4-11, 10-12, 7-11	-28.0
  Steve Brown	Antony Moore	Swanmore A 2-8 IBM B	11-9, 11-6, 9-11, 6-11, 5-11	-23.0
  Allan Bransgrove	Steve Curram	Medstead B 6-4 Kings C	17-15, 11-6, 10-12, 4-11, 6-11	-22.2
  Graham Richards	Iliya Dimitrov	IBM B 8-2 Winnall	11-8, 11-4, 10-12, 7-11, 5-11	-21.4
  Dave Diment	Hitender Razora	Swanmore A 2-8 IBM B	7-11, 4-11, 11-9, 11-8, 14-12	-20.8
  Steve Brown	Phil Weatherill	IBM B 2-8 South Wonston A	9-11, 9-11, 11-5, 11-9, 13-11	-20.0
  Antony Moore	Tim Kimber	Swanmore A 8-2 South Wonston B	9-11, 7-11, 11-7, 11-5, 11-5	-19.9
  Roy Bright	Colin Ley-Smith	Kings C 4-6 Winnall	6-11, 8-11, 11-6, 11-7, 12-10	-16.0
  Colin Ley-Smith	Phil Weatherill	Winnall 6-4 South Wonston A	8-11, 8-11, 11-5, 11-2, 11-2	-13.8
  Chris Edwards	Roy Bright	Kings C 6-4 South Wonston A	11-4, 15-13, 4-11, 11-13, 6-11	-11.0
  John Hayman	Roy Bright	Medstead B 4-6 Kings C	10-12, 7-11, 12-10, 11-5, 11-5	-9.2
  Barry Mitchell	Quentin Brook	Kings D 9-1 Kings E	12-10, 11-4, 6-11, 8-11, 12-14	-8.5
  Glenn Phur	Colin Ley-Smith	Winnall 2-8 Medstead B	11-5, 11-4, 6-11, 6-11, 11-13	-7.4
  Quentin Brook	Vince Leggett	Five Tees D 8-2 Kings D	13-11, 11-5, 8-11, 8-11, 9-11	-6.9
  Ian McLeonards	Vince Leggett	Owslebury 4-6 Five Tees D	8-11, 9-11, 11-4, 11-9, 12-10	-5.6
  Mike Wooding	Geoff Pavey	Medstead B 5-5 Swanmore A	9-11, 9-11, 11-9, 11-9, 11-5	-5.4
  Andrew Bawden	Gary Longland	Five Tees B 4-6 Medstead A	12-10, 12-10, 7-11, 8-11, 9-11	-4.7
  Russell Durham	Len Field	Winnall 3-7 Five Tees C	11-13, 10-12, 11-9, 11-7, 11-7	-4.0
  Peter Whitmarsh	Geoff Pavey	Five Tees C 6-4 Swanmore A	5-11, 2-11, 13-11, 11-6, 11-8	-3.7
  John Pryor	Vince Leggett	Kings D 3-7 Five Tees D	0-11, 16-18, 11-6, 11-8, 11-9	-3.7
  Graham Richards	Dom Goddard	South Wonston B 5-5 Winnall	11-4, 11-7, 12-14, 8-11, 9-11	-2.3
  Glenn Phur	Steve Brown	IBM B 5-5 Medstead B	11-7, 11-5, 12-14, 10-12, 8-11	-1.2

  
  
• Distribution of match scores ..interesting differences between Divisions
  
  • Now we have 3 Divisions, I'd expect Division 2 results to cluster around the middle (5-5 or 6-4), with more extreme results in Divisions 1 and 3. Let's see what happens.

  Division 1 1   4         2     9                   6             3       7               3       6             2     2     10-0 9-1 8-2 7-3 6-4 5-5 4-6 3-7 2-8 1-9 0-10 Home wins 22 Draws 3 Away wins 20

  Division 2 6             2     13                           6             13                           11                       9                   12                         7               4         0 10-0 9-1 8-2 7-3 6-4 5-5 4-6 3-7 2-8 1-9 0-10 Home wins 40 Draws 11 Away wins 32

  Division 3 4         4         3       3       9                   8                 12                         9                   8                 2     1   10-0 9-1 8-2 7-3 6-4 5-5 4-6 3-7 2-8 1-9 0-10 Home wins 23 Draws 8 Away wins 32

• Improvers
  Who has apparently improved most this season, compared to last season?
  This table assumes that if Player A has played Player B this season AND last season, and has won a greater percentage of the points in those matches this season than last season, then Player A has improved relative to Player B. Of course, both may have improved or got worse, so we consider ALL of the players that Player A has played in BOTH seasons ('players-in-common'), and calculate who has made the biggest improvement overall.
  Players you have ONLY played this season or ONLY played last season don't count towards your Score.
  You're unlikely to appear in the list in either of these cases:
  • This is your first season in the League (no 'last season' to compare with)
  • You're playing in a different Division from last season (not enough players-in-common to compare with)
  Contact martinhealeys.org.uk if you have any comments or questions!
  This table is about improvement - win or lose, you only have to do better in terms of points than you did against the same people last season, to score higher on this list!
  61 League players currently have enough players-in-common over the two seasons to qualify (6 players-in-common is the minimum), but only Improvers (those with a Score higher than 0%) are listed here!
  

  Pos	Player	Club	Improvement	ThisSeason% ('pts for'/total)	LastSeason% ('pts for'/total)	Players-In-Common (mouse over to see who they are)
  1	Danny Klinger	South Wonston	22.9%	55.0% (365/664)	44.7% (313/700)	9
  2	Allan Bransgrove	Kings	17.0%	48.2% (659/1367)	41.2% (365/886)	12
  3	Keith Dickenson	IBM	13.1%	54.3% (298/549)	48.0% (336/700)	7
  4	Andy Knight	Hursley	11.2%	49.4% (259/524)	44.5% (245/551)	6
  5	Jay Jadeja	Kings	10.5%	55.2% (411/744)	50.0% (277/554)	6
  6	Mark Every	Kings	10.3%	42.1% (526/1248)	38.2% (394/1031)	11
  7	Paul Martin	Kings	7.0%	45.8% (558/1218)	42.8% (719/1679)	11
  8	Dave Diment	Swanmore	6.6%	56.8% (343/604)	53.3% (244/458)	7
  9	Hugo Gregan	Five Tees	6.2%	55.3% (1119/2025)	52.1% (1152/2213)	14
  10	Jared Schaller	IBM	5.8%	56.6% (517/914)	53.4% (838/1568)	9
  11	Rob Chapman	South Wonston	5.8%	58.7% (440/750)	55.4% (316/570)	9
  12	Tom Wood	IBM	5.3%	54.0% (924/1711)	51.3% (1040/2028)	13
  13	Oliver Lee	South Wonston	4.9%	53.6% (732/1366)	51.1% (681/1333)	11
  14	Hitender Razora	IBM	3.9%	51.5% (316/613)	49.6% (263/530)	6
  15	Martin Ceresa	Hursley	3.9%	64.2% (490/763)	61.8% (270/437)	7
  16	Ian Burgess	Swanmore	3.5%	56.5% (645/1142)	54.6% (670/1228)	13
  17	Barry Dobson	Hursley	3.4%	59.0% (1340/2272)	57.0% (1210/2122)	15
  18	Vince Leggett	Five Tees	3.3%	52.6% (513/975)	50.9% (520/1021)	9
  19	Quentin Brook	Kings	2.8%	49.4% (506/1024)	48.1% (428/890)	10
  20	Graham Lynch	Five Tees	1.5%	61.6% (573/930)	60.7% (476/784)	13
  21	Paul May	IBM	1.5%	56.2% (368/655)	55.4% (536/968)	7
  22	Dom Goddard	South Wonston	1.0%	50.2% (689/1372)	49.7% (579/1164)	10
  23	Phil Lee	South Wonston	0.9%	46.9% (563/1200)	46.5% (570/1226)	11
  24	Nick Webb	IBM	0.9%	55.0% (739/1344)	54.5% (920/1688)	11
  25	Peter Budd	Owslebury	0.7%	50.7% (685/1350)	50.4% (664/1318)	9
  26	Paul Newbery	Five Tees	0.7%	46.0% (756/1643)	45.7% (1019/2230)	14