Trivia Leaderboard

See all the traditional Singles averages here.

Trivia HQ ... all the minor and mostly meaningless player stats gathered together in one place!

• Best performers in Singles points for/against overall
• Best performers in 5-game Singles legs
• Best performers in games ("Ends") won
• Best performers in Doubles legs
• Most points in a Singles leg
• Most 5-game legs in a match
• Most points in a match
• Giantkillers
• Heroic recoveries: They went 2-0 down, but won 3-2
• Distribution of match scores
• Improvers: who has got better scores this season than last season, against the same players?

• Best performers in Singles points for/against overall (qualification: 250 points):
  

  Pos	Player	Club	Points For	Won (Percent)
  1	Julian Walton	IBM	518	60.5%
  2	David Wills	Five Tees	887	58.2%
  3	Ben Tombs	Medstead	683	58.1%
  4	Graham Lynch	Five Tees	1025	58.0%
  5	Micky Lang	Medstead	459	56.2%
  6	Paul May	IBM	613	56.1%
  7	Jill Wilson	Kings	447	55.7%
  8	Adam Lee	South Wonston	1123	55.6%
  9	Martin Ceresa	Hursley	950	55.5%
  10	Steve Swan	Five Tees	692	55.4%
  10	Keith Dickenson	IBM	444	55.4%

  
  
• Best performers in 5-game Singles legs (qualification: three 5-game Singles):
  

  Pos	Player	Club	Played	Won (Percent)
  1	Clive Welsman	Kings	5	100.0%
  1	Russell Durham	Winnall	4	100.0%
  1	Ben Tombs	Medstead	3	100.0%
  1	John Hayman	Medstead	3	100.0%
  5	Oliver Lee	South Wonston	8	87.5%
  6	Jamie Cole	Kings	6	83.3%
  6	John Pryor	Kings	6	83.3%
  8	Glenn Phur	Medstead	5	80.0%
  9	Bobby Zhou	Kings	9	77.8%
  10	Teresa Hildyard	Kings	4	75.0%
  10	Andy Quick	Kings	4	75.0%
  10	Leyon Joseph	Five Tees	4	75.0%
  10	Paul May	IBM	4	75.0%

  
  
• Best performers in games ("Ends") won (qualification: nine Ends):
  

  Pos	Player	Club	Played	Won (Percent)
  1	Julian Walton	IBM	48	89.6%
  2	David Wills	Five Tees	82	86.6%
  3	Neil Adams	Winnall	11	81.8%
  4	Ben Tombs	Medstead	66	77.3%
  5	Adam Lee	South Wonston	109	73.4%
  6	Kevin Muldowney	Swanmore	82	73.2%
  7	Tim Kimber	South Wonston	87	72.4%
  8	Jill Wilson	Kings	43	72.1%
  9	Micky Lang	Medstead	45	71.1%
  10	Martin Ceresa	Hursley	96	70.8%
  11	Graham Lynch	Five Tees	105	70.5%

  
  
• Best performers in Doubles legs (qualification: four Doubles):
  

  Pos	Player	Club	Played	Won (Percent)
  1	Oliver Lee	South Wonston	8	100.0%
  1	Micky Lang	Medstead	4	100.0%
  1	Jill Wilson	Kings	4	100.0%
  1	Paul May	IBM	4	100.0%
  5	Tony Gregan	Five Tees	8	87.5%
  6	John Pryor	Kings	7	85.7%
  7	Ben Tombs	Medstead	6	83.3%
  7	Dave Hooker	Winnall	6	83.3%
  9	Steve Swan	Five Tees	5	80.0%
  9	Andrew Bawden	Medstead	5	80.0%
  9	Graham Lynch	Five Tees	5	80.0%
  9	Julian Walton	IBM	5	80.0%

  
  
• Most points in a Singles leg:
  

  115 points	Dave Hooker Vs Dan Kimber	28-11-19	Winnall 8-2 South Wonston B	11-7, 8-11, 11-7, 19-21, 11-9
  114 points	Martyn Davey Vs Steve Brown	07-10-19	South Wonston B 4-6 IBM B	9-11, 10-12, 13-11, 11-9, 15-13
  112 points	John Frisby Vs Richard Anderson	15-01-20	Kings D 3-7 Medstead B	10-12, 11-9, 13-15, 12-10, 11-9
  111 points	Kevin Buchanan Vs Jamie Cole	17-12-19	Five Tees C 0-10 Kings B	11-7, 11-13, 8-11, 13-11, 12-14
  110 points	Jamie Cole Vs Andrew Bawden	09-10-19	Kings B 6-4 Medstead A	13-11, 13-11, 7-11, 11-13, 11-9
  110 points	Russell Durham Vs Tim Kimber	28-11-19	Winnall 8-2 South Wonston B	10-12, 15-13, 10-12, 11-5, 12-10
  110 points	Andy Prince Vs Bobby Zhou	13-01-20	Kings A 3-7 Kings B	11-6, 14-16, 11-13, 11-9, 8-11
  109 points	Dave Fox Vs Bobby Zhou	11-11-19	Five Tees B 5-5 Kings B	15-13, 11-13, 11-9, 7-11, 8-11
  108 points	Jon Stubbs Vs Andy Prince	24-09-19	Five Tees B 4-6 Kings A	14-12, 9-11, 11-9, 10-12, 11-9
  108 points	Bobby Zhou Vs Andrew Bawden	09-10-19	Kings B 6-4 Medstead A	10-12, 13-11, 10-12, 12-10, 11-7
  108 points	Cameron Aris Vs Andrew Bawden	18-11-19	Kings A 3-7 Medstead A	11-8, 13-15, 11-9, 8-11, 10-12

  
  
• Most 5-game legs in a match:
  

  	Date	Match-card and teams
  7 legs	12-12-19	Medstead A 5-5 Kings B
  7 legs	03-12-19	Swanmore A 5-5 South Wonston A
  6 legs	09-12-19	Kings D 7-3 IBM C
  5 legs	16-12-19	IBM B 6-4 South Wonston B
  5 legs	11-12-19	South Wonston A 8-2 Hursley
  5 legs	01-10-19	Swanmore B 3-7 IBM C
  4 legs	24-10-19	Medstead B 8-2 Kings D
  4 legs	22-10-19	Winnall 5-5 Swanmore A
  4 legs	13-01-20	Kings A 3-7 Kings B
  4 legs	11-11-19	Owslebury 7-3 Kings E
  4 legs	09-01-20	Medstead B 4-6 Swanmore B
  4 legs	07-10-19	South Wonston B 4-6 IBM B
  4 legs	07-01-20	Swanmore A 5-5 Winnall
  4 legs	02-12-19	IBM C 5-5 Swanmore B
  4 legs	01-10-19	IBM B 3-7 Winnall

  
  
• Late nights (most points in a match):
  The average number of points per match this season has been 680.

  Total Points	Match	Lateness (amt above average)	Date
  875	Medstead A 5-5 Kings B	28.7%	12/12/19
  837	Swanmore A 5-5 South Wonston A	23.1%	03/12/19
  821	Kings D 7-3 IBM C	20.8%	09/12/19
  814	IBM B 3-7 Winnall	19.8%	01/10/19
  813	IBM B 6-4 South Wonston B	19.6%	16/12/19
  810	Five Tees B 5-5 Kings B	19.2%	11/11/19
  809	Winnall 4-6 South Wonston A	19.0%	15/11/19
  795	South Wonston A 8-2 Hursley	17.0%	11/12/19
  791	South Wonston B 4-6 IBM B	16.4%	07/10/19
  783	Swanmore B 3-7 IBM C	15.2%	01/10/19
  783	Kings A 5-5 Five Tees C	15.2%	11/11/19

  
  
• Giantkillers
  Who are the pussycats who occasionally roar 'Miaou!!' after a lifetime of meekly saying 'Mew!'? You're featured here!
  The averages shown are per Division, and regardless of which team(s) you played for in that Division.
  Qualification: 7 Singles in the Division concerned, and at least a 35% difference.
  

  	Div	Percent Diff	Underdog		Favourite	Scores
  16 Dec	2	61.1%	Dom Goddard (16.7%)	beat	Iliya Dimitrov (77.8%)	11-8, 11-9, 5-11, 7-11, 11-5
  12 Dec	1	55.6%	Tony Amies (22.2%)	beat	Bobby Zhou (77.8%)	11-8, 10-12, 4-11, 11-9, 11-9
  16 Oct	3	50.0%	Raphael Herbaut (33.3%)	beat	Jill Wilson (83.3%)	9-11, 11-7, 11-6, 11-9
  7 Oct	2	44.5%	Martyn Davey (33.3%)	beat	Iliya Dimitrov (77.8%)	11-4, 12-10, 4-11, 11-5
  14 Oct	1	42.9%	Hitender Razora (23.8%)	beat	Cameron Brealey (66.7%)	11-9, 12-10, 9-11, 12-10
  7 Oct	1	41.7%	Keith Charbit-Middleton (33.3%)	beat	Keith Dickenson (75.0%)	11-7, 7-11, 11-13, 11-9, 11-9
  7 Oct	3	41.7%	Raphael Herbaut (33.3%)	beat	Ian Burgess (75.0%)	8-11, 13-11, 5-11, 11-9, 11-8
  9 Jan	3	41.7%	Rob Christie (33.3%)	beat	John Bonney (75.0%)	10-12, 11-8, 11-1, 11-6
  7 Oct	3	38.9%	Vas Shcherbinin (44.4%)	beat	Jill Wilson (83.3%)	11-9, 11-8, 11-9
  24 Sep	2	36.4%	Dan Kimber (28.6%)	beat	Antony Moore (65.0%)	10-12, 4-11, 11-3, 11-9, 11-7
  9 Dec	3	36.3%	Martin Woolf (33.3%)	beat	Tony Gregan (69.6%)	7-11, 11-4, 11-9, 11-9
  21 Oct	3	36.3%	Rob Christie (33.3%)	beat	Tony Gregan (69.6%)	12-10, 12-10, 7-11, 8-11, 11-4
  3 Dec	2	35.8%	Phil Lee (29.2%)	beat	Antony Moore (65.0%)	11-7, 13-11, 11-8
  13 Jan	1	35.8%	Andy Prince (37.5%)	beat	Jamie Cole (73.3%)	11-6, 4-11, 4-11, 11-5, 13-11
  11 Nov	1	35.2%	Dave Fox (38.9%)	beat	Clive Welsman (74.1%)	14-12, 11-9, 13-11

  
  
• They did not cave in after going 2-0 down...
  Is it worth battling on after going 2-0 down in games, even though your average is worse than your opponent's? These players thought so!
  The results are listed in 'Giantkiller' order, comparing the League averages of both players.
  A minus-sign in the 'Percent Diff' column means the player came back to win, even though he or she has a lower average in the same Division.
  To keep the list short, only those who have beaten players with a better average are shown.

  Winner	Loser	Match	Leg score	Percent Diff
  Dan Kimber	Antony Moore	Swanmore A 5-5 South Wonston B	12-10, 11-4, 3-11, 9-11, 7-11	-36.4
  Teresa Hildyard	Vas Shcherbinin	Kings E 3-7 IBM C	8-11, 8-11, 11-8, 11-2, 11-8	-17.7
  Quentin Brook	Steve Coltman	Swanmore B 2-8 Kings D	12-10, 11-9, 8-11, 11-13, 10-12	-11.9
  Cameron Aris	Hugo Gregan	Kings A 7-3 Five Tees B	8-11, 8-11, 11-5, 11-6, 11-8	-9.3
  Steve Coltman	Richard Anderson	Medstead B 4-6 Swanmore B	11-7, 11-4, 5-11, 3-11, 12-14	-8.5
  Steve Coltman	Hannah Wills	Five Tees D 5-5 Swanmore B	12-10, 11-9, 5-11, 8-11, 9-11	-3.3
  Dave Hooker	Tom Wood	IBM B 3-7 Winnall	11-6, 11-6, 9-11, 8-11, 8-11	-1.1
  Clive Welsman	Micky Lang	Medstead A 5-5 Kings B	11-6, 15-13, 9-11, 3-11, 9-11	-0.9

  
  
• Distribution of match scores ..interesting differences between Divisions
  
  • Now we have 3 Divisions, I'd expect Division 2 results to cluster around the middle (5-5 or 6-4), with more extreme results in Divisions 1 and 3. Let's see what happens.

  Division 1 1   2     0 6             4         6             3       3       2     1   2     10-0 9-1 8-2 7-3 6-4 5-5 4-6 3-7 2-8 1-9 0-10 Home wins 13 Draws 6 Away wins 11

  Division 2 0 1   2     0 4         8                 6             10                     1   1   1   10-0 9-1 8-2 7-3 6-4 5-5 4-6 3-7 2-8 1-9 0-10 Home wins 7 Draws 8 Away wins 19

  Division 3 2     4         3       5           2     3       2     7               3       3       1   10-0 9-1 8-2 7-3 6-4 5-5 4-6 3-7 2-8 1-9 0-10 Home wins 16 Draws 3 Away wins 16

• Improvers
  Who has apparently improved most this season, compared to last season?
  This table assumes that if Player A has played Player B this season AND last season, and has won a greater percentage of the points in those matches this season than last season, then Player A has improved relative to Player B. Of course, both may have improved or got worse, so we consider ALL of the players that Player A has played in BOTH seasons ('players-in-common'), and calculate who has made the biggest improvement overall.
  Players you have ONLY played this season or ONLY played last season don't count towards your Score.
  You're unlikely to appear in the list in either of these cases:
  • This is your first season in the League (no 'last season' to compare with)
  • You're playing in a different Division from last season (not enough players-in-common to compare with)
  Contact martinhealeys.org.uk if you have any comments or questions!
  This table is about improvement - win or lose, you only have to do better in terms of points than you did against the same people last season, to score higher on this list!
  48 League players currently have enough players-in-common over the two seasons to qualify (6 players-in-common is the minimum), but only Improvers (those with a Score higher than 0%) are listed here!
  

  Pos	Player	Club	Improvement	This Season % ('pts for'/total)	Last Season % ('pts for'/total)	Players-In-Common (mouse over to see who they are)
  1	Graham Lynch	Five Tees	13.7%	71.6% (297/415)	63.0% (459/729)	9
  2	Martyn Davey	South Wonston	12.9%	48.9% (372/760)	43.3% (280/646)	8
  3	Julian Walton	IBM	12.0%	61.0% (340/557)	54.5% (417/765)	10
  4	David Wills	Five Tees	11.7%	59.3% (562/947)	53.1% (862/1623)	11
  5	Colin Ley-Smith	Winnall	11.6%	52.3% (431/824)	46.9% (563/1201)	10
  6	Clive Welsman	Kings	10.5%	55.8% (433/776)	50.5% (704/1394)	9
  7	Bobby Zhou	Kings	9.8%	53.0% (542/1023)	48.2% (410/850)	9
  8	Kevin Sage	Swanmore	9.6%	45.2% (273/604)	41.2% (294/713)	9
  9	Geoff Pavey	Swanmore	7.8%	52.0% (424/815)	48.2% (741/1536)	9
  10	Leyon Joseph	Five Tees	6.7%	49.2% (442/899)	46.1% (714/1549)	11
  11	Dan Kimber	South Wonston	6.2%	44.8% (370/825)	42.2% (204/483)	8
  12	Rob Christie	Swanmore	5.6%	46.1% (304/659)	43.7% (252/577)	8
  13	Teresa Hildyard	Kings	5.5%	42.5% (236/555)	40.3% (330/819)	9
  14	Tim Kimber	South Wonston	5.2%	54.6% (563/1032)	51.9% (473/912)	11
  15	John Pryor	Kings	4.3%	51.3% (445/868)	49.1% (739/1504)	12
  16	Russell Durham	Winnall	3.9%	53.3% (475/892)	51.3% (815/1590)	11
  17	Jill Wilson	Kings	3.2%	57.9% (270/466)	56.1% (660/1176)	7
  18	Dave Hooker	Winnall	3.1%	49.2% (619/1257)	47.8% (987/2067)	16
  19	Phil Lee	South Wonston	2.9%	46.3% (346/747)	45.0% (298/662)	6
  20	Steve Brown	IBM	2.5%	48.1% (483/1004)	46.9% (562/1198)	11
  21	Kevin Muldowney	Swanmore	2.3%	54.5% (632/1160)	53.3% (838/1573)	11
  22	Hannah Wills	Five Tees	2.2%	53.5% (453/846)	52.4% (548/1046)	10
  23	Steve Coltman	Swanmore	2.2%	49.2% (363/738)	48.1% (526/1093)	8
  24	Quentin Brook	Kings	1.4%	47.0% (329/700)	46.4% (473/1020)	9
  25	Tony Gregan	Five Tees	0.9%	54.7% (498/910)	54.2% (598/1103)	10