Trivia Leaderboard

See all the traditional Singles averages here.

Trivia HQ ... all the minor and mostly meaningless player stats gathered together in one place!

• Best performers in Singles points for/against overall
• Best performers in 5-game Singles legs
• Best performers in games ("Ends") won
• Best performers in Doubles legs
• Most points in a Singles leg
• Most 5-game legs in a match
• Most points in a match
• Giantkillers
• Heroic recoveries: They went 2-0 down, but won 3-2
• Distribution of match scores
• Improvers: who has got better scores this season than last season, against the same players?

• Best performers in Singles points for/against overall (qualification: 250 points):
  

  Pos	Player	Club	Points For	Won (Percent)
  1	Martin Ceresa	Hursley	448	63.1%
  2	Graham Lynch	Five Tees	527	62.9%
  3	Keith Charbit-Middleton	Five Tees	644	61.0%
  4	Barry Dobson	Hursley	1011	60.6%
  5	Sorin Lakatos	Five Tees	921	58.6%
  6	Ian Burgess	Swanmore	646	58.5%
  7	Paul May	IBM	550	57.6%
  8	Danny Klinger	South Wonston	315	57.0%
  9	David Wills	Five Tees	694	56.9%
  10	Sanjay Nagchowdhury	IBM	645	56.5%
  11	Jared Schaller	IBM	662	56.3%

  
  
• Best performers in 5-game Singles legs (qualification: three 5-game Singles):
  

  Pos	Player	Club	Played	Won (Percent)
  1	Hannah Wills	Five Tees	4	100.0%
  1	Clive Welsman	Kings	3	100.0%
  1	Sanjay Nagchowdhury	IBM	3	100.0%
  1	Barry Dobson	Hursley	3	100.0%
  1	Paul May	IBM	3	100.0%
  1	Geoff Ball	IBM	3	100.0%
  7	Hugo Gregan	Five Tees	5	80.0%
  7	Glenn Phur	Medstead	5	80.0%
  7	Adam Lee	South Wonston	5	80.0%
  10	Mike Wooding	Medstead	4	75.0%
  10	Russell Durham	Winnall	4	75.0%
  10	Paul Newbery	Five Tees	4	75.0%
  10	Allan Bransgrove	Kings	4	75.0%

  
  
• Best performers in games ("Ends") won (qualification: nine Ends):
  

  Pos	Player	Club	Played	Won (Percent)
  1	Sean Pickin	Medstead	10	90.0%
  2	Graham Lynch	Five Tees	49	87.8%
  3	Barry Dobson	Hursley	93	87.1%
  4	Martin Ceresa	Hursley	42	85.7%
  5	Keith Charbit-Middleton	Five Tees	61	85.2%
  6	Danny Klinger	South Wonston	30	83.3%
  7	Sorin Lakatos	Five Tees	86	79.1%
  8	David Wills	Five Tees	69	76.8%
  9	Ian Burgess	Swanmore	63	76.2%
  10	Jared Schaller	IBM	65	75.4%
  11	Paul May	IBM	54	74.1%

  
  
• Best performers in Doubles legs (qualification: four Doubles):
  

  Pos	Player	Club	Played	Won (Percent)
  1	John Pryor	Kings	4	100.0%
  2	Sorin Lakatos	Five Tees	7	85.7%
  3	Sanjay Nagchowdhury	IBM	6	83.3%
  4	Geoff Cockroft	Kings	5	80.0%
  4	Vince Leggett	Five Tees	5	80.0%
  4	Jared Schaller	IBM	5	80.0%
  4	Ian McLeonards	Owslebury	5	80.0%
  8	Kevin Muldowney	Swanmore	8	75.0%
  8	Rob Christie	Swanmore	4	75.0%
  8	Graham Lynch	Five Tees	4	75.0%
  8	Leyon Joseph	Five Tees	4	75.0%
  8	Keith Charbit-Middleton	Five Tees	4	75.0%
  8	Andy Prince	Kings	4	75.0%
  8	Paul May	IBM	4	75.0%
  8	Geoff Ball	IBM	4	75.0%

  
  
• Most points in a Singles leg:
  

  116 points	Richard Darch Vs Micky Lang	21-11-18	Five Tees B 18191.fiveteesbvsmedsteada.1.html Medstead A	12-14, 11-9, 17-15, 7-11, 9-11
  111 points	Jay Jadeja Vs Sorin Lakatos	16-10-18	Kings C 18191.kingscvsfiveteesc.1.html Five Tees C	12-10, 15-13, 5-11, 12-14, 8-11
  111 points	Peter Budd Vs Barry Mitchell	26-11-18	Owslebury 18191.owsleburyvskingse.1.html Kings E	12-10, 6-11, 10-12, 18-16, 5-11
  110 points	Tony Cottrell Vs Barry Mitchell	03-10-18	Kings D 18191.kingsdvskingse.1.html Kings E	15-13, 13-15, 6-11, 11-8, 7-11
  110 points	Adrian Reeves Vs Anne Longland	12-11-18	Kings B 18191.kingsbvsfiveteesb.1.html Five Tees B	3-11, 11-7, 11-13, 15-13, 14-12
  108 points	Paul May Vs Ben Tombs	03-12-18	IBM A 18191.ibmavsmedsteada.1.html Medstead A	11-13, 11-8, 10-12, 13-11, 11-8
  107 points	John Bonney Vs Dom Goddard	15-11-18	Medstead B 18191.medsteadbvssouthwonstonb.1.html South Wonston B	5-11, 11-7, 6-11, 11-5, 19-21
  107 points	Geoff Ball Vs Dave Hooker	15-10-18	IBM B 18191.ibmbvswinnall.1.html Winnall	11-6, 9-11, 12-14, 13-11, 11-9
  106 points	Jeet Banerjee Vs John Pryor	24-09-18	IBM C 18191.ibmcvskingsd.1.html Kings D	14-12, 7-11, 14-12, 6-11, 8-11
  106 points	Oliver Lee Vs Ben Adams	24-10-18	South Wonston A 18191.southwonstonavssouthwonstonb.1.html South Wonston B	10-12, 13-11, 11-7, 7-11, 13-11
  106 points	Ian McLeonards Vs Rob Christie	06-11-18	Owslebury 18191.owsleburyvsswanmoreb.1.html Swanmore B	12-10, 9-11, 9-11, 11-9, 13-11
  106 points	Andy Prince Vs Andrew Bawden	24-09-18	Kings A 18191.kingsavsmedsteada.1.html Medstead A	4-11, 18-16, 8-11, 11-8, 8-11

  
  
• Most 5-game legs in a match:
  

  	Date	Match-card and teams
  6 legs	21-10-18	Winnall 18191.winnallvsmedsteadb.1.html Medstead B
  5 legs	11-12-18	Kings C 18191.kingscvsswanmorea.1.html Swanmore A
  5 legs	08-11-18	Kings A 18191.kingsavsfiveteesa.1.html Five Tees A
  5 legs	03-10-18	South Wonston A 18191.southwonstonavsswanmorea.1.html Swanmore A
  4 legs	27-09-18	Medstead B 18191.medsteadbvskingsc.1.html Kings C
  4 legs	26-11-18	IBM B 18191.ibmbvsfiveteesc.1.html Five Tees C
  4 legs	24-10-18	South Wonston A 18191.southwonstonavssouthwonstonb.1.html South Wonston B
  4 legs	19-11-18	Owslebury 18191.owsleburyvsibmc.1.html IBM C
  4 legs	19-11-18	Kings C 18191.kingscvsibmb.1.html IBM B
  4 legs	18-10-18	Medstead B 18191.medsteadbvsswanmorea.1.html Swanmore A
  4 legs	17-10-18	Kings D 18191.kingsdvsowslebury.1.html Owslebury
  4 legs	12-11-18	Kings C 18191.kingscvssouthwonstona.1.html South Wonston A
  4 legs	12-11-18	IBM B 18191.ibmbvsswanmorea.1.html Swanmore A
  4 legs	12-11-18	Hursley 18191.hursleyvsowslebury.1.html Owslebury
  4 legs	10-12-18	Five Tees D 18191.fiveteesdvsowslebury.1.html Owslebury
  4 legs	09-10-18	Kings A 18191.kingsavskingsb.1.html Kings B
  4 legs	03-10-18	Kings D 18191.kingsdvskingse.1.html Kings E

  
  
• Late nights (most points in a match):
  The average number of points per match this season has been 677.

  Total Points	Match	Lateness (amt above average)	Date
  816	Kings C 18191.kingscvsswanmorea.1.html Swanmore A	20.5%	11/12/18
  816	Kings C 18191.kingscvssouthwonstona.1.html South Wonston A	20.5%	12/11/18
  812	Kings A 18191.kingsavsfiveteesa.1.html Five Tees A	19.9%	08/11/18
  810	Winnall 18191.winnallvsmedsteadb.1.html Medstead B	19.6%	21/10/18
  798	Medstead B 18191.medsteadbvskingsc.1.html Kings C	17.8%	27/09/18
  785	Kings C 18191.kingscvsibmb.1.html IBM B	15.9%	19/11/18
  783	IBM B 18191.ibmbvsmedsteadb.1.html Medstead B	15.6%	01/10/18
  769	Owslebury 18191.owsleburyvsibmc.1.html IBM C	13.5%	19/11/18
  764	Medstead B 18191.medsteadbvsswanmorea.1.html Swanmore A	12.8%	18/10/18
  762	Kings A 18191.kingsavskingsb.1.html Kings B	12.5%	09/10/18
  761	Medstead B 18191.medsteadbvswinnall.1.html Winnall	12.3%	13/12/18

  
  
• Giantkillers
  Who are the pussycats who occasionally roar 'Miaou!!' after a lifetime of meekly saying 'Mew!'? You're featured here!
  The averages shown are per Division, and regardless of which team(s) you played for in that Division.
  Qualification: 7 Singles in the Division concerned, and at least a 35% difference.
  

  	Div	Percent Diff	Underdog		Favourite	Scores
  12 Nov	2	54.5%	Geoff Pavey (21.7%)	beat	Hitender Razora (76.2%)	11-5, 10-12, 11-8, 11-7
  7 Nov	2	47.2%	Steve Brown (25.0%)	beat	Adam Lee (72.2%)	11-9, 5-11, 11-9, 11-9
  19 Nov	2	40.0%	Allan Bransgrove (26.7%)	beat	Iliya Dimitrov (66.7%)	5-11, 5-11, 11-9, 11-9, 11-7
  5 Dec	1	36.1%	Paul Martin (8.3%)	beat	Paul Newbery (44.4%)	11-9, 8-11, 11-1, 11-8

  
  
• They did not cave in after going 2-0 down...
  Is it worth battling on after going 2-0 down in games, even though your average is worse than your opponent's? These players thought so!
  The results are listed in 'Giantkiller' order, comparing the League averages of both players.
  A minus-sign in the 'Percent Diff' column means the player came back to win, even though he or she has a lower average in the same Division.
  To keep the list short, only those who have beaten players with a better average are shown.

  Winner	Loser	Match	Leg score	Percent Diff
  Allan Bransgrove	Iliya Dimitrov	Kings C 18191.kingscvsibmb.1.html IBM B	5-11, 5-11, 11-9, 11-9, 11-7	-40.0
  Russell Durham	Len Field	Winnall 18191.winnallvsfiveteesc.1.html Five Tees C	11-13, 10-12, 11-9, 11-7, 11-7	-17.5
  Len Field	Cameron Aris	Kings A 18191.kingsavsfiveteesb.1.html Five Tees B	11-6, 11-3, 9-11, 10-12, 7-11	-6.7
  Dave Hooker	Peter Whitmarsh	Winnall 18191.winnallvsfiveteesc.1.html Five Tees C	6-11, 9-11, 11-9, 11-9, 11-6	-6.6
  Adam Lee	Kevin Muldowney	South Wonston A 18191.southwonstonavsswanmorea.1.html Swanmore A	7-11, 6-11, 13-11, 11-5, 11-7	-4.7
  Glenn Phur	Colin Ley-Smith	Winnall 18191.winnallvsmedsteadb.1.html Medstead B	11-5, 11-4, 6-11, 6-11, 11-13	-0.9

  
  
• Distribution of match scores ..interesting differences between Divisions
  
  • Now we have 3 Divisions, I'd expect Division 2 results to cluster around the middle (5-5 or 6-4), with more extreme results in Divisions 1 and 3. Let's see what happens.

  Division 1 1   0 0 5           3       2     4         1   3       1   1   10-0 9-1 8-2 7-3 6-4 5-5 4-6 3-7 2-8 1-9 0-10 Home wins 9 Draws 2 Away wins 10

  Division 2 2     0 5           2     5           5           4         9                   2     1   0 10-0 9-1 8-2 7-3 6-4 5-5 4-6 3-7 2-8 1-9 0-10 Home wins 14 Draws 5 Away wins 16

  Division 3 2     1   2     1   5           4         7               4         2     1   0 10-0 9-1 8-2 7-3 6-4 5-5 4-6 3-7 2-8 1-9 0-10 Home wins 11 Draws 4 Away wins 14

• Improvers
  Who has apparently improved most this season, compared to last season?
  This table assumes that if Player A has played Player B this season AND last season, and has won a greater percentage of the points in those matches this season than last season, then Player A has improved relative to Player B. Of course, both may have improved or got worse, so we consider ALL of the players that Player A has played in BOTH seasons ('players-in-common'), and calculate who has made the biggest improvement overall.
  Players you have ONLY played this season or ONLY played last season don't count towards your Score.
  You're unlikely to appear in the list in either of these cases:
  • This is your first season in the League (no 'last season' to compare with)
  • You're playing in a different Division from last season (not enough players-in-common to compare with)
  Contact martinhealeys.org.uk if you have any comments or questions!
  This table is about improvement - win or lose, you only have to do better in terms of points than you did against the same people last season, to score higher on this list!
  43 League players currently have enough players-in-common over the two seasons to qualify (6 players-in-common is the minimum), but only Improvers (those with a Score higher than 0%) are listed here!
  

  Pos	Player	Club	Improvement	ThisSeason% ('pts for'/total)	LastSeason% ('pts for'/total)	Players-In-Common (mouse over to see who they are)
  1	Jay Jadeja	Kings	12.3%	56.2% (260/463)	50.0% (277/554)	6
  2	Allan Bransgrove	Kings	10.6%	46.5% (283/608)	42.1% (271/644)	8
  3	Steve Coltman	Swanmore	8.6%	52.7% (286/543)	48.5% (418/862)	8
  4	Hugo Gregan	Five Tees	8.2%	55.0% (644/1171)	50.8% (890/1751)	11
  5	Mike Wooding	Medstead	5.0%	47.1% (312/663)	44.8% (414/924)	8
  6	Jared Schaller	IBM	4.7%	57.3% (304/531)	54.7% (499/913)	6
  7	Tim Kimber	South Wonston	4.0%	56.1% (276/492)	53.9% (513/951)	7
  8	Barry Dobson	Hursley	3.2%	58.4% (661/1132)	56.6% (1111/1963)	13
  9	Steve Curram	Medstead	3.1%	51.1% (431/844)	49.6% (666/1344)	10
  10	Paul May	IBM	2.6%	56.8% (229/403)	55.4% (536/968)	7
  11	Russell Durham	Winnall	2.4%	55.0% (222/404)	53.7% (483/900)	6
  12	Dom Goddard	South Wonston	2.2%	50.6% (228/451)	49.5% (365/738)	6
  13	John Bonney	Medstead	0.9%	47.8% (318/665)	47.4% (409/863)	7
  14	David Wills	Five Tees	0.6%	56.2% (342/609)	55.8% (678/1215)	8
  15	Graham Lynch	Five Tees	0.6%	58.5% (296/506)	58.2% (310/533)	8
  16	Ian Burgess	Swanmore	0.5%	55.7% (334/600)	55.4% (466/841)	7
  17	Vince Leggett	Five Tees	0.2%	52.2% (215/412)	52.1% (285/547)	6
  18	Paul Newbery	Five Tees	0.1%	45.3% (291/642)	45.3% (659/1456)	8